[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20240703095712.64202-4-dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2024 09:56:57 +0000
From: Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@...ux.intel.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Mingwei Zhang <mizhang@...gle.com>,
Xiong Zhang <xiong.y.zhang@...el.com>,
Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@...ux.intel.com>,
Like Xu <like.xu.linux@...il.com>,
Jinrong Liang <cloudliang@...cent.com>,
Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@...el.com>,
Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: [Patch v5 03/18] x86: pmu: Refine fixed_events[] names
In SDM the fixed counter is numbered from 0 but currently the
fixed_events names are numbered from 1. It would cause confusion for
users. So Change the fixed_events[] names to number from 0 as well and
keep identical with SDM.
Reviewed-by: Mingwei Zhang <mizhang@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@...ux.intel.com>
---
x86/pmu.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/x86/pmu.c b/x86/pmu.c
index 865dbe67..60db8bdf 100644
--- a/x86/pmu.c
+++ b/x86/pmu.c
@@ -45,9 +45,9 @@ struct pmu_event {
{"branches", 0x00c2, 1*N, 1.1*N},
{"branch misses", 0x00c3, 0, 0.1*N},
}, fixed_events[] = {
- {"fixed 1", MSR_CORE_PERF_FIXED_CTR0, 10*N, 10.2*N},
- {"fixed 2", MSR_CORE_PERF_FIXED_CTR0 + 1, 1*N, 30*N},
- {"fixed 3", MSR_CORE_PERF_FIXED_CTR0 + 2, 0.1*N, 30*N}
+ {"fixed 0", MSR_CORE_PERF_FIXED_CTR0, 10*N, 10.2*N},
+ {"fixed 1", MSR_CORE_PERF_FIXED_CTR0 + 1, 1*N, 30*N},
+ {"fixed 2", MSR_CORE_PERF_FIXED_CTR0 + 2, 0.1*N, 30*N}
};
char *buf;
--
2.40.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists