lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed,  3 Jul 2024 20:21:53 +0800
From: Fred Li <dracodingfly@...il.com>
To: pabeni@...hat.com
Cc: aleksander.lobakin@...el.com,
	andrii@...nel.org,
	ast@...nel.org,
	bpf@...r.kernel.org,
	daniel@...earbox.net,
	davem@...emloft.net,
	dracodingfly@...il.com,
	edumazet@...gle.com,
	haoluo@...gle.com,
	hawk@...nel.org,
	john.fastabend@...il.com,
	jolsa@...nel.org,
	kpsingh@...nel.org,
	kuba@...nel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux@...ssschuh.net,
	martin.lau@...ux.dev,
	mkhalfella@...estorage.com,
	nbd@....name,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	sashal@...nel.org,
	sdf@...gle.com,
	song@...nel.org,
	yonghong.song@...ux.dev,
	herbert@...dor.apana.org.au
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] net: Fix skb_segment when splitting gso_size mangled skb having linear-headed frag_list whose head_frag=true

> I must admit I more than a bit lost in the many turns of skb_segment(),
> but the above does not look like the correct solution, as it will make
> the later BUG_ON() unreachable/meaningless.

Sorry, the subsequent BUG_ON maybe should be removed in this patch, because
for skb_headlen(list_skb) > len, it will continue splitting as commit 13acc94eff122 
(net: permit skb_segment on head_frag frag_list skb) does.

> 
> Do I read correctly that when the BUG_ON() triggers:
> 
> list_skb->len is 125
> len is 75
> list_skb->frag_head is true
>

yes, it's correct.
list_skb->len is 125
gso_size is 75, also the len in the BUG_ON conditon
list_skb->head_frag is true
 
> It looks like skb_segment() is becoming even and ever more complex to
> cope with unexpected skb layouts, only possibly when skb_segment() is
> called by some BPF helpers.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Paolo

I'll wait for more suggestions from others.

Thanks

Fred Li



Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ