[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20240704114039.4fd0739593cd0a96fe428496@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2024 11:40:39 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Peng Zhang <zhangpeng362@...wei.com>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <willy@...radead.org>,
<ying.huang@...el.com>, <fengwei.yin@...el.com>, <david@...hat.com>,
<aneesh.kumar@...ux.ibm.com>, <shy828301@...il.com>, <hughd@...gle.com>,
<wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>, <sunnanyong@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] filemap: replace pte_offset_map() with
pte_offset_map_nolock()
On Tue, 25 Jun 2024 14:06:43 -0700 Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Mar 2024 09:29:13 +0800 Peng Zhang <zhangpeng362@...wei.com> wrote:
>
> > From: ZhangPeng <zhangpeng362@...wei.com>
> >
> > The vmf->ptl in filemap_fault_recheck_pte_none() is still set from
> > handle_pte_fault(). But at the same time, we did a pte_unmap(vmf->pte).
> > After a pte_unmap(vmf->pte) unmap and rcu_read_unlock(), the page table
> > may be racily changed and vmf->ptl maybe fails to protect the actual
> > page table.
> > Fix this by replacing pte_offset_map() with pte_offset_map_nolock().
> >
> > ...
> >
> > --- a/mm/filemap.c
> > +++ b/mm/filemap.c
> > @@ -3207,7 +3207,8 @@ static vm_fault_t filemap_fault_recheck_pte_none(struct vm_fault *vmf)
> > if (!(vmf->flags & FAULT_FLAG_ORIG_PTE_VALID))
> > return 0;
> >
> > - ptep = pte_offset_map(vmf->pmd, vmf->address);
> > + ptep = pte_offset_map_nolock(vma->vm_mm, vmf->pmd, vmf->address,
> > + &vmf->ptl);
> > if (unlikely(!ptep))
> > return VM_FAULT_NOPAGE;
> >
>
> whoops, I'm still sitting on this because I didn't know whether we
> should backport it.
>
> And... guess what I say next. Can we please describe what are the
> userspace visible effects of the bug?
>
Nobody?
Oh well, I'll add cc:stable amd move this into mm-hotfixes.
From: ZhangPeng <zhangpeng362@...wei.com>
Subject: filemap: replace pte_offset_map() with pte_offset_map_nolock()
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2024 09:29:13 +0800
The vmf->ptl in filemap_fault_recheck_pte_none() is still set from
handle_pte_fault(). But at the same time, we did a pte_unmap(vmf->pte).
After a pte_unmap(vmf->pte) unmap and rcu_read_unlock(), the page table
may be racily changed and vmf->ptl maybe fails to protect the actual page
table. Fix this by replacing pte_offset_map() with
pte_offset_map_nolock().
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240313012913.2395414-1-zhangpeng362@huawei.com
Fixes: 58f327f2ce80 ("filemap: avoid unnecessary major faults in filemap_fault()")
Signed-off-by: ZhangPeng <zhangpeng362@...wei.com>
Suggested-by: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
Cc: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
Cc: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@...radead.org>
Cc: Nanyong Sun <sunnanyong@...wei.com>
Cc: Yang Shi <shy828301@...il.com>
Cc: Yin Fengwei <fengwei.yin@...el.com>
Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
---
mm/filemap.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/mm/filemap.c~filemap-replace-pte_offset_map-with-pte_offset_map_nolock
+++ a/mm/filemap.c
@@ -3231,7 +3231,8 @@ static vm_fault_t filemap_fault_recheck_
if (!(vmf->flags & FAULT_FLAG_ORIG_PTE_VALID))
return 0;
- ptep = pte_offset_map(vmf->pmd, vmf->address);
+ ptep = pte_offset_map_nolock(vma->vm_mm, vmf->pmd, vmf->address,
+ &vmf->ptl);
if (unlikely(!ptep))
return VM_FAULT_NOPAGE;
_
Powered by blists - more mailing lists