| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <Zob2n61NsenmtfpC@x1>
Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2024 16:23:11 -0300
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
To: Howard Chu <howardchu95@...il.com>
Cc: namhyung@...nel.org, adrian.hunter@...el.com, irogers@...gle.com,
jolsa@...nel.org, kan.liang@...ux.intel.com,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/8] perf trace: Augment enum arguments with BTF
On Sat, Jun 29, 2024 at 08:27:42AM +0800, Howard Chu wrote:
> Hello Namhyung,
>
> Thank you for testing this, I will fix this.
So for this case I further updated the patch introducing the workload to
the patch at the end of this message, but then there is still this
problem I'm looking at:
43 7.54 ubuntu:18.04-x-arm : FAIL gcc version 7.5.0 (Ubuntu/Linaro 7.5.0-3ubuntu1~18.04)
tests/workloads/landlock.c:27:15: error: packed attribute causes inefficient alignment for 'allowed_access' [-Werror=attributes]
__u64 allowed_access;
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
tests/workloads/landlock.c:28:15: error: packed attribute causes inefficient alignment for 'parent_fd' [-Werror=attributes]
__s32 parent_fd;
^~~~~~~~~
cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
/git/perf-6.10.0-rc3/tools/build/Makefile.build:158: recipe for target 'workloads' failed
make[4]: *** [workloads] Error 2
/git/perf-6.10.0-rc3/tools/build/Makefile.build:158: recipe for target 'tests' failed
make[3]: *** [tests] Error 2
-----------------
Which is real and a problem when building with those landlock patches on
32-bit arches, probably that was considered a non-issue and so I'll just
disable that warning when building this specific file with perf.
- Arnaldo
-----------------
>From da1681838fcb36450b17f2ff4b0c7aed742a8a57 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Howard Chu <howardchu95@...il.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2024 02:13:42 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] perf test: Add landlock workload
We'll use it to add a regression test for the BTF augmentation of enum
arguments for tracepoints in 'perf trace':
root@x1:~# perf trace -e landlock_add_rule perf test -w landlock
0.000 ( 0.009 ms): perf/747160 landlock_add_rule(ruleset_fd: 11, rule_type: LANDLOCK_RULE_PATH_BENEATH, rule_attr: 0x7ffd8e258594, flags: 45) = -1 EINVAL (Invalid argument)
0.011 ( 0.002 ms): perf/747160 landlock_add_rule(ruleset_fd: 11, rule_type: LANDLOCK_RULE_NET_PORT, rule_attr: 0x7ffd8e2585a0, flags: 45) = -1 EINVAL (Invalid argument)
root@x1:~#
Committer notes:
It was agreed on the discussion (see Link below) to shorten then name of
the workload from 'landlock_add_rule' to 'landlock', and I moved it to a
separate patch.
Also, to address a build failure from Namhyung, I stopped loading
linux/landlock.h and instead added the used defines, enums and types to
make this build in older systems. All we want is to emit the syscall and
intercept it.
Suggested-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Howard Chu <howardchu95@...il.com>
Tested-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
Cc: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>
Cc: Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAH0uvohaypdTV6Z7O5QSK+va_qnhZ6BP6oSJ89s1c1E0CjgxDA@mail.gmail.com
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240624181345.124764-1-howardchu95@gmail.com
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240624181345.124764-6-howardchu95@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
---
tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c | 1 +
tools/perf/tests/tests.h | 1 +
tools/perf/tests/workloads/Build | 1 +
tools/perf/tests/workloads/landlock.c | 66 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
4 files changed, 69 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 tools/perf/tests/workloads/landlock.c
diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c b/tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c
index c3d84b67ca8e775d..470a9709427ddaad 100644
--- a/tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c
+++ b/tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c
@@ -152,6 +152,7 @@ static struct test_workload *workloads[] = {
&workload__sqrtloop,
&workload__brstack,
&workload__datasym,
+ &workload__landlock,
};
static int num_subtests(const struct test_suite *t)
diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/tests.h b/tools/perf/tests/tests.h
index 3aa7701ee0e939f7..6ea2be86b7bf8bb4 100644
--- a/tools/perf/tests/tests.h
+++ b/tools/perf/tests/tests.h
@@ -205,6 +205,7 @@ DECLARE_WORKLOAD(leafloop);
DECLARE_WORKLOAD(sqrtloop);
DECLARE_WORKLOAD(brstack);
DECLARE_WORKLOAD(datasym);
+DECLARE_WORKLOAD(landlock);
extern const char *dso_to_test;
extern const char *test_objdump_path;
diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/workloads/Build b/tools/perf/tests/workloads/Build
index 48bf0d3b0f3d6ebe..5af17206f04d16fd 100644
--- a/tools/perf/tests/workloads/Build
+++ b/tools/perf/tests/workloads/Build
@@ -6,6 +6,7 @@ perf-test-y += leafloop.o
perf-test-y += sqrtloop.o
perf-test-y += brstack.o
perf-test-y += datasym.o
+perf-test-y += landlock.o
CFLAGS_sqrtloop.o = -g -O0 -fno-inline -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE
CFLAGS_leafloop.o = -g -O0 -fno-inline -fno-omit-frame-pointer -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE
diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/workloads/landlock.c b/tools/perf/tests/workloads/landlock.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000..0c2bcdaf22636a89
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/perf/tests/workloads/landlock.c
@@ -0,0 +1,66 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
+#include <linux/compiler.h>
+#include <linux/types.h>
+#include <unistd.h>
+#include "../tests.h"
+
+/* This workload was initially added to test enum augmentation with BTF in perf
+ * trace because its the only syscall that has an enum argument. Since it is
+ * a recent addition to the Linux kernel (at the time of the introduction of this
+ * 'perf test' workload) we just add the required types and defines here instead
+ * of including linux/landlock, that isn't available in older systems.
+ *
+ * We are not interested in the the result of the syscall, just in intercepting
+ * its arguments.
+ */
+
+#ifndef __NR_landlock_add_rule
+#define __NR_landlock_add_rule 445
+#endif
+
+#ifndef LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_READ_FILE
+#define LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_READ_FILE (1ULL << 2)
+
+#define LANDLOCK_RULE_PATH_BENEATH 1
+
+struct landlock_path_beneath_attr {
+ __u64 allowed_access;
+ __s32 parent_fd;
+} __attribute__((packed));
+#endif
+
+#ifndef LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_CONNECT_TCP
+#define LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_CONNECT_TCP (1ULL << 1)
+
+#define LANDLOCK_RULE_NET_PORT 2
+
+struct landlock_net_port_attr {
+ __u64 allowed_access;
+ __u64 port;
+};
+#endif
+
+static int landlock(int argc __maybe_unused, const char **argv __maybe_unused)
+{
+ int fd = 11, flags = 45;
+
+ struct landlock_path_beneath_attr path_beneath_attr = {
+ .allowed_access = LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_READ_FILE,
+ .parent_fd = 14,
+ };
+
+ struct landlock_net_port_attr net_port_attr = {
+ .port = 19,
+ .allowed_access = LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_CONNECT_TCP,
+ };
+
+ syscall(__NR_landlock_add_rule, fd, LANDLOCK_RULE_PATH_BENEATH,
+ &path_beneath_attr, flags);
+
+ syscall(__NR_landlock_add_rule, fd, LANDLOCK_RULE_NET_PORT,
+ &net_port_attr, flags);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+DEFINE_WORKLOAD(landlock);
--
2.45.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists