[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <172012303630.184013.1986960651509995819.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2024 12:57:33 -0700
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>,
Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Steinar Gunderson <sesse@...gle.com>,
Matt Fleming <matt@...dmodwrite.com>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/2] Try to avoid some qsorts
On Wed, 03 Jul 2024 10:21:15 -0700, Ian Rogers wrote:
> Reference count checking doesn't work well with rbtree due to the need
> for counts on each child and parent edge. As such the reference count
> checking changes removed rbtree and replaced them with sorted
> arrays. There have been instances where sorting has been shown to be a
> regression:
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240521165109.708593-1-irogers@google.com/
>
> [...]
Applied to perf-tools-next, thanks!
Best regards,
Namhyung
Powered by blists - more mailing lists