[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHk-=whabFzoT+iLSF1A-u-4fBvtLGMBvi67xUOqww7PGp2B8Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2024 15:07:31 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: "Jason A . Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>, cgzones@...glemail.com,
Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: deconflicting new syscall numbers for 6.11
On Thu, 4 Jul 2024 at 14:45, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
>
> It's not random, it's all the architectures: the ones that
> don't have a syscall.tbl file are the ones that use the table
> in include/uapi/asm-generic/unistd.h.
Ok.
I think it's bogus to reseve system calls for everybody even when it
makes no sense.
But it's also pretty moot, since I think the whole system call has to go away.
All it is is an odd wrapper around mmap() anyway, and it's a useful
enough thing *outside* of getrandom() that I pretty much guarantee it
will be used for other things than vgetrandom anyway.
Linus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists