[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2024070458-compile-amused-7d1c@gregkh>
Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2024 09:30:19 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org,
patches@...nelci.org, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de,
jonathanh@...dia.com, f.fainelli@...il.com,
sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com, srw@...dewatkins.net, rwarsow@....de,
conor@...nel.org, allen.lkml@...il.com, broonie@...nel.org,
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.6 000/163] 6.6.37-rc1 review
On Wed, Jul 03, 2024 at 06:04:57PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Jul 2024 at 14:27, Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 2 Jul 2024 at 22:48, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> > <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.6.37 release.
> > > There are 163 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > > let me know.
> > >
> > > Responses should be made by Thu, 04 Jul 2024 17:01:55 +0000.
> > > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > >
> > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.6.37-rc1.gz
> > > or in the git tree and branch at:
> > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.6.y
> > > and the diffstat can be found below.
> > >
> > > thanks,
> > >
> > > greg k-h
> >
> > The following powerpc builds failed on stable-rc 6.6.
> >
> > powerpc:
> > - gcc-13-defconfig
> > - clang-18-defconfig
> >
> > Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@...aro.org>
> >
> > Build log:
> > ---------
> > arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c: In function 'bpf_int_jit_compile':
> > arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c:208:17: error: ignoring return value
> > of 'bpf_jit_binary_lock_ro' declared with attribute
> > 'warn_unused_result' [-Werror=unused-result]
> > 208 | bpf_jit_binary_lock_ro(bpf_hdr);
> > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
> >
>
> Anders bisected this down to,
> first bad commit: [28ae2e78321b5ac25958b3fcae0dcc80116e0c50]
> bpf: Take return from set_memory_rox() into account with
> bpf_jit_binary_lock_ro()
Thanks, that's due to some changes that happened in 6.7 in this area,
I've queued those changes up now and will push out a -rc2 later today.
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists