linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 2/4] x86/fred: Write to FRED MSRs with wrmsrns()

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <848595B3-9AAC-405E-B132-4B5169045631@zytor.com>
Date: Thu, 04 Jul 2024 01:28:01 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Xin Li <xin@...or.com>
CC: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@...rix.com>, dave.hansen@...el.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com,
        dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, x86@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org,
        nik.borisov@...e.com, houwenlong.hwl@...group.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/4] x86/fred: Write to FRED MSRs with wrmsrns()

On July 4, 2024 1:23:43 AM PDT, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de> wrote:
>On Wed, Jul 03, 2024 at 10:57:29PM -0700, Xin Li wrote:
>> Won't it be way better if we could have all x86 vendors agree on it?
>
>It would be way better if you simply do it as I suggested and stop debating.
>One fine day you'll know why I'm adamant about it.
>
>Thx.
>

I think that counts as an objection, so let's do it.