[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <957a0c8e-f80b-4f6f-ac6f-70398abafd6f@arm.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2024 09:35:22 +0100
From: Steven Price <steven.price@....com>
To: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...labora.com>,
Liviu Dudau <liviu.dudau@....com>
Cc: dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Adrián Larumbe <adrian.larumbe@...labora.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/panthor: Record devfreq busy as soon as a job is
started
On 03/07/2024 16:56, Steven Price wrote:
> If a queue is already assigned to the hardware, then a newly submitted
> job can start straight away without waiting for the tick. However in
> this case the devfreq infrastructure isn't notified that the GPU is
> busy. By the time the tick happens the job might well have finished and
> no time will be accounted for the GPU being busy.
>
> Fix this by recording the GPU as busy directly in queue_run_job() in the
> case where there is a CSG assigned and therefore we just ring the
> doorbell.
>
> Fixes: de8548813824 ("drm/panthor: Add the scheduler logical block")
> Signed-off-by: Steven Price <steven.price@....com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_sched.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_sched.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_sched.c
> index 951ff7e63ea8..e7afaa1ad8dc 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_sched.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_sched.c
> @@ -2942,6 +2942,7 @@ queue_run_job(struct drm_sched_job *sched_job)
> pm_runtime_get(ptdev->base.dev);
> sched->pm.has_ref = true;
> }
> + panthor_devfreq_record_busy(sched->ptdev);
> }
>
> /* Update the last fence. */
Pushed to drm-misc-next
Thanks,
Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists