[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c83ef39f-2267-4d02-9d77-65baa5a026c1@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2024 11:03:00 +0200
From: Javier Carrasco <javier.carrasco.cruz@...il.com>
To: Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@...il.com>,
Support Opensource <support.opensource@...semi.com>,
Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>, Xu Yilun <yilun.xu@...el.com>,
Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, imx@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7] mfd: rohm-bd9576: Constify struct regmap_config
On 04/07/2024 06:50, Matti Vaittinen wrote:
> On 7/3/24 18:37, Javier Carrasco wrote:
>> `bd957x_regmap` is not modified and can be declared as const
>> to move its data to a read-only section.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Javier Carrasco <javier.carrasco.cruz@...il.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/mfd/rohm-bd9576.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/rohm-bd9576.c b/drivers/mfd/rohm-bd9576.c
>> index 3a9f61961721..634c65c7d108 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mfd/rohm-bd9576.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mfd/rohm-bd9576.c
>> @@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ static const struct regmap_access_table
>> volatile_regs = {
>> .n_yes_ranges = ARRAY_SIZE(volatile_ranges),
>> };
>> -static struct regmap_config bd957x_regmap = {
>> +static const struct regmap_config bd957x_regmap = {
>> .reg_bits = 8,
>> .val_bits = 8,
>> .volatile_table = &volatile_regs,
>>
>
> Thanks a ton Javier. This looks good to me but if you feel like going an
> extra mile while you are at it... Do you think this could be extended to:
>
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/rohm-bd9576.c b/drivers/mfd/rohm-bd9576.c
> index 3a9f61961721..17323ae39803 100644
> --- a/drivers/mfd/rohm-bd9576.c
> +++ b/drivers/mfd/rohm-bd9576.c
> @@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ static const struct regmap_access_table volatile_regs = {
> .n_yes_ranges = ARRAY_SIZE(volatile_ranges),
> };
>
> -static struct regmap_config bd957x_regmap = {
> +static const struct regmap_config bd957x_regmap = {
> .reg_bits = 8,
> .val_bits = 8,
> .volatile_table = &volatile_regs,
> @@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ static struct regmap_config bd957x_regmap = {
> .cache_type = REGCACHE_MAPLE,
> };
>
> -static struct regmap_irq bd9576_irqs[] = {
> +static const struct regmap_irq bd9576_irqs[] = {
> REGMAP_IRQ_REG(BD9576_INT_THERM, 0, BD957X_MASK_INT_MAIN_THERM),
> REGMAP_IRQ_REG(BD9576_INT_OVP, 0, BD957X_MASK_INT_MAIN_OVP),
> REGMAP_IRQ_REG(BD9576_INT_SCP, 0, BD957X_MASK_INT_MAIN_SCP),
> @@ -76,7 +76,7 @@ static struct regmap_irq bd9576_irqs[] = {
> REGMAP_IRQ_REG(BD9576_INT_SYS, 0, BD957X_MASK_INT_MAIN_SYS),
> };
>
> -static struct regmap_irq_chip bd9576_irq_chip = {
> +static const struct regmap_irq_chip bd9576_irq_chip = {
> .name = "bd9576_irq",
> .irqs = &bd9576_irqs[0],
> .num_irqs = ARRAY_SIZE(bd9576_irqs),
>
>
> Yours,
> -- Matti
>
Sure, I will generalize it and update the series to cover regmap_irq and
regmap_irq_chip as well, of course including these two cases too.
Best regards,
Javier Carrasco
Powered by blists - more mailing lists