[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20240704103514.3035-1-hdanton@sina.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2024 18:35:14 +0800
From: Hillf Danton <hdanton@...a.com>
To: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
Cc: netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org,
syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com,
syzbot+4fd66a69358fc15ae2ad@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH nf] netfilter: nf_tables: unconditionally flush pending work before notifier
On Wed, 3 Jul 2024 15:01:07 +0200 Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
> Hillf Danton <hdanton@...a.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, 3 Jul 2024 12:52:15 +0200 Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
> > > Hillf Danton <hdanton@...a.com> wrote:
> > > > Given trans->table goes thru the lifespan of trans, your proposal is a bandaid
> > > > if trans outlives table.
> > >
> > > trans must never outlive table.
> > >
> > What is preventing trans from being freed after closing sock, given
> > trans is freed in workqueue?
> >
> > close sock
> > queue work
>
> The notifier acquires the transaction mutex, locking out all other
> transactions, so no further transactions requests referencing
> the table can be queued.
>
As per the syzbot report, trans->table could be instantiated before
notifier acquires the transaction mutex. And in fact the lock helps
trans outlive table even with your patch.
cpu1 cpu2
--- ---
transB->table = A
lock trans mutex
flush work
free A
unlock trans mutex
queue work to free transB
> The work queue is flushed before potentially ripping the table
> out. After this, no transactions referencing the table can exist
> anymore; the only transactions than can still be queued are those
> coming from a different netns, and tables are scoped per netns.
>
> Table is torn down. Transaction mutex is released.
>
> Next transaction from userspace can't find the table anymore (its gone),
> so no more transactions can be queued for this table.
>
> As I wrote in the commit message, the flush is dumb, this should first
> walk to see if there is a matching table to be torn down, and then flush
> work queue once before tearing the table down.
>
> But its better to clearly split bug fix and such a change.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists