[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <tqghwucifrtbeeucsrbbc4zx22axaij7f4qx3rwhj27kmohgci@zin7ke5272n5>
Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2024 16:19:47 +0300
From: Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@...il.com>
To: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>
Cc: Andrew Halaney <ahalaney@...hat.com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>, Jose Abreu <joabreu@...opsys.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>, John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com, bpf@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC net-next v2 17/17] net: stmmac: pcs: Drop the _SHIFT
macros
On Fri, Jun 28, 2024 at 03:42:41PM +0100, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 24, 2024 at 04:26:34PM +0300, Serge Semin wrote:
> > The PCS_ANE_PSE_SHIFT and PCS_ANE_RFE_SHIFT are unused anyway. Moreover
> > PCS_ANE_PSE and PCS_ANE_RFE are the respective field masks. So the
> > FIELD_GET()/FIELD_SET() macro-functions can be used to get/set the fields
> > content. Drop the _SHIFT macros for good then.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@...il.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_pcs.h | 2 --
> > 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_pcs.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_pcs.h
> > index a17e5b37c411..0f15c9898788 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_pcs.h
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_pcs.h
> > @@ -43,9 +43,7 @@
> > #define PCS_ANE_FD BIT(5) /* AN Full-duplex flag */
> > #define PCS_ANE_HD BIT(6) /* AN Half-duplex flag */
> > #define PCS_ANE_PSE GENMASK(8, 7) /* AN Pause Encoding */
> > -#define PCS_ANE_PSE_SHIFT 7
> > #define PCS_ANE_RFE GENMASK(13, 12) /* AN Remote Fault Encoding */
> > -#define PCS_ANE_RFE_SHIFT 12
> > #define PCS_ANE_ACK BIT(14) /* AN Base-page acknowledge */
>
> I would actually like to see all these go away.
>
> PCS_ANE_FD == LPA_1000XFULL
> PCS_ANE_HD == LPA_1000XHALF
> PCS_ANE_PSE == LPA_1000XPAUSE and LPA_1000XPAUSE_ASYM
> PCS_ANE_RFE == LPA_RESV and LPA_RFAULT
> PCS_ANE_ACK == LPA_LPACK
Great! It will be even better.
>
> Isn't it rather weird that the field layout matches 802.3z aka
> 1000base-X and not SGMII? This layout would not make sense for Cisco
> SGMII as it loses the speed information conveyed by the Cisco SGMII
> control word.
>
> This isn't a case of the manufacturer using "SGMII" to mean a serial
> gigabit media independent interface that supports 1000base-X
> (PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_1000BASEX) rather than Cisco SGMII
> (PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_SGMII) ?
It's not that weird. The only CSRs available and functional for SGMII
PCS are PCS_AN_CTRL and PCS_AN_STATUS (plus PCS_SRGMII_CSR where the
PCS exposes the link status, aka Cisco SGMII tx_config_reg[15:0] with
the vendor-specific layout). Registers from PCS_ANE_ADV up to PCS_TBI_EXT
exist for TBI and RTBI PCS only. Since TBI is defined in the IEEE
802.3z C36 I guess that's why the layout matches to what is described
in IEEE 802.3z C37.
-Serge(y)
>
> --
> RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
> FTTP is here! 80Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists