lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2024070430-smell-cornhusk-1d6c@gregkh>
Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2024 16:11:41 +0200
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
Cc: 88c258bd-3d0c-de79-b411-6552841eb8d0@...il.com,
	Linux-kernel-mentees@...ts.linuxfoundation.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, luisbg@...nel.org,
	salah.triki@...il.com,
	syzbot+fc26c366038b54261e53@...kaller.appspotmail.com,
	syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs/befs: fix shift-out-of-bounds in befs_check_sb

On Thu, Jul 04, 2024 at 04:08:40PM +0200, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Jul 2024 at 16:04, Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 04, 2024 at 03:50:57PM +0200, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > What's the kernel policy for such cases?
> >
> > What "case"?
> >
> > There is no context here at all, and I can't find any patch on lore at
> > all.
> >
> > Please always properly quote stuff...
> 
> It's not easy with kernel lists. I used the lore suggested reply-to
> command. Here is full thread:
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240704135057.1174408-1-dvyukov@google.com/

I see no patch on lore on this thread :(

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ