[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Zogpum23mjHZC8yO@slm.duckdns.org>
Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2024 07:13:30 -1000
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: "boy.wu" <boy.wu@...iatek.com>
Cc: Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
Boris Burkov <boris@....io>, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, iverlin.wang@...iatek.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] blk-cgroup: add spin_lock for u64_stats_update
Hello,
On Fri, Jul 05, 2024 at 03:55:44PM +0800, boy.wu wrote:
> From: Boy Wu <boy.wu@...iatek.com>
>
> In 32bit SMP systems, if the system is stressed on the sys node
> by processes, it may cause blkcg_fill_root_iostats to have a concurrent
What is sys node?
> problem on the seqlock in u64_stats_update, which will cause a deadlock
> on u64_stats_fetch_begin in blkcg_print_one_stat.
I'm not following the scenario. Can you please detail the scenario where
this leads to deadlocks?
Thanks.
--
tejun
Powered by blists - more mailing lists