lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2746673.mvXUDI8C0e@rjwysocki.net>
Date: Fri, 05 Jul 2024 21:43:30 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To: Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
 LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@....com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/2] thermal: core: Sanitize polling delay values

Hi Everyone,

This is a v2 of

https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/4585590.LvFx2qVVIh@rjwysocki.net/

which is being sent because the second patch in the v2 was incorrect.

These 2 patches deal with issues that may arise if the polling delay value used
for passive polling is at odds with the polling delay values used otherwise.

The first patch simply eliminates the need to worry about possible negative
polling delay values by changing the data type used for representing them
to unsigend int.

The other patch adds a sanity check to ensure that "passive" polling will not
be less frequent than "regular" polling.

Thanks!




Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ