linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/5] dt-bindings: clock: add clock binding definitions for Exynos Auto v920

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <8f4deb36-2a44-414a-9b9f-40b87bc7c949@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2024 08:02:30 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Sunyeal Hong <sunyeal.hong@...sung.com>,
 Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>,
 Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>, Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
 Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] dt-bindings: clock: add clock binding definitions for
 Exynos Auto v920

On 05/07/2024 04:11, Sunyeal Hong wrote:
> Add device tree clock binding definitions for below CMU blocks.
> 
> - CMU_TOP
> - CMU_PERIC0
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sunyeal Hong <sunyeal.hong@...sung.com>

Headers are part of bindings patch.

<form letter>
Please use scripts/get_maintainers.pl to get a list of necessary people
and lists to CC. It might happen, that command when run on an older
kernel, gives you outdated entries. Therefore please be sure you base
your patches on recent Linux kernel.

Tools like b4 or scripts/get_maintainer.pl provide you proper list of
people, so fix your workflow. Tools might also fail if you work on some
ancient tree (don't, instead use mainline) or work on fork of kernel
(don't, instead use mainline). Just use b4 and everything should be
fine, although remember about `b4 prep --auto-to-cc` if you added new
patches to the patchset.

You missed at least devicetree list (maybe more), so this won't be
tested by automated tooling. Performing review on untested code might be
a waste of time.

Please kindly resend and include all necessary To/Cc entries.
</form letter>

Best regards,
Krzysztof