[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c4b23da5-10fc-476e-8acc-8ba0815f5def@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2024 08:43:35 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Andrei Simion <andrei.simion@...rochip.com>, robh@...nel.org,
krzk+dt@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org, nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com,
alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com, claudiu.beznea@...on.dev
Cc: devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/7] ARM: dts: microchip: at91-sama5d34ek: Align the
eeprom nodename
On 04/07/2024 17:14, Andrei Simion wrote:
> Align the eeprom nodename according to device tree specification
> and at24.yaml.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrei Simion <andrei.simion@...rochip.com>
Squash.
> ---
> arch/arm/boot/dts/microchip/sama5d34ek.dts | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/microchip/sama5d34ek.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/microchip/sama5d34ek.dts
> index bffd61397cb5..18943b873fff 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/microchip/sama5d34ek.dts
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/microchip/sama5d34ek.dts
> @@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ i2c0: i2c@...14000 {
> i2c1: i2c@...18000 {
> status = "okay";
>
> - 24c256@50 {
> + eeprom@50 {
What about other names? Why not fixing everything at once?
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists