[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240705071036.GW11386@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2024 09:10:36 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org>
Cc: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>, Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>,
Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@...omium.org>,
Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>, Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 bpf-next 1/9] uprobe: Add support for session consumer
On Wed, Jul 03, 2024 at 01:36:19PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> Yes, please use struct_size_t(). This is exactly what it was designed for.
Kees, please, just let up, not going to happen. I'm getting really fed
up having to endlessly repeat what a piece of shite struct_size() is.
Put your time and effort into doing a proper language extension so we
can go and delete all that __builtin_*_overflow() based garbage.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists