[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdXvxXZUE0LwCYPt3HyuQTvM6Rus_RidJ24Ttd_4e_m-HQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2024 10:19:50 +0200
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To: Michael Walle <mwalle@...nel.org>
Cc: Andrew Davis <afd@...com>, Ayush Singh <ayush@...gleboard.org>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Vaishnav M A <vaishnav@...gleboard.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Derek Kiernan <derek.kiernan@....com>, Dragan Cvetic <dragan.cvetic@....com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>, Tero Kristo <kristo@...nel.org>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
jkridner@...gleboard.org, robertcnelson@...gleboard.org,
linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 7/7] dts: ti: k3-am625-beagleplay: Add mikroBUS
On Fri, Jul 5, 2024 at 10:01 AM Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org> wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Jun 2024, Michael Walle wrote:
> > On Thu Jun 27, 2024 at 7:07 PM CEST, Andrew Davis wrote:
> >>> + mikrobus_boards {
> >>> + thermo_click: thermo-click {
> >>> + compatible = "maxim,max31855k", "mikrobus-spi";
> >>
> >> I might be missing something, but your solution cannot possibly be
> >> to list every click board that could be connected (all 1500+ of them)
> >> to every mikroBUS connector on every device's DT file..
> >>
> >> Each click board should have a single DTSO overlay file to describe the
> >> click board, one per click board total. And then that overlay should
> >> apply cleanly to any device that has a mikroBUS interface.
> >>
> >> Which means you have not completely solved the fundamental problem of
> >> abstracting the mikroBUS connector in DT. Each of these click device child
> >> nodes has to be under the parent connector node. Which means a phandle
> >> to the parent node, which is not generically named. For instance
> >> if my board has 2 connectors, I would have mikrobus0 and mikrobus1,
> >> the click board's overlay would look like this:
> >>
> >> /dts-v1/;
> >> /plugin/;
> >>
> >> &mikrobus0 {
>
> Let's use just "&mikrobus" instead...
>
> >> status = "okay";
> >>
> >> mikrobus_board {
> >> thermo-click {
> >> compatible = "maxim,max31855k", "mikrobus-spi";
Max31855k is an SPI device, so its device node should be under an "spi"
subnode (with proper #{address,size}-cells) of the mikrobus connector,
and use a suitable unit-address and "reg" property, pointing to the
right SPI chip select.
> >> spi-max-frequency = <1000000>;
This belongs to the "spi" subnode, not the Max31855k device node.
> >> pinctrl-apply = "spi_default";
This belongs to the mikrobus connector node.
> >> };
> >> };
> >> };
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
Powered by blists - more mailing lists