[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <40ba1239-bbe2-470b-8574-c7e098b40bc7@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2024 11:25:22 +0200
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@....com>, Lance Yang <ioworker0@...il.com>,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc: dj456119@...il.com, 21cnbao@...il.com, shy828301@...il.com,
ziy@...dia.com, libang.li@...group.com, baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Barry Song <baohua@...nel.org>, Mingzhe Yang <mingzhe.yang@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] mm: add docs for per-order mTHP split counters
On 05.07.24 11:16, Ryan Roberts wrote:
> On 04/07/2024 02:29, Lance Yang wrote:
>> This commit introduces documentation for mTHP split counters in
>> transhuge.rst.
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Barry Song <baohua@...nel.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Mingzhe Yang <mingzhe.yang@...com>
>> Signed-off-by: Lance Yang <ioworker0@...il.com>
>> ---
>> Documentation/admin-guide/mm/transhuge.rst | 20 ++++++++++++++++----
>> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/mm/transhuge.rst b/Documentation/admin-guide/mm/transhuge.rst
>> index 1f72b00af5d3..0830aa173a8b 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/mm/transhuge.rst
>> +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/mm/transhuge.rst
>> @@ -369,10 +369,6 @@ also applies to the regions registered in khugepaged.
>> Monitoring usage
>> ================
>>
>> -.. note::
>> - Currently the below counters only record events relating to
>> - PMD-sized THP. Events relating to other THP sizes are not included.
>> -
>> The number of PMD-sized anonymous transparent huge pages currently used by the
>> system is available by reading the AnonHugePages field in ``/proc/meminfo``.
>> To identify what applications are using PMD-sized anonymous transparent huge
>> @@ -514,6 +510,22 @@ file_fallback_charge
>> falls back to using small pages even though the allocation was
>> successful.
>>
>> +split
>> + is incremented every time a huge page is successfully split into
>> + smaller orders. This can happen for a variety of reasons but a
>> + common reason is that a huge page is old and is being reclaimed.
>> + This action implies splitting any block mappings into PTEs.
>
> nit: the block mappings will already be PTEs if starting with mTHP?
Was confused by that as well, so maybe just drop that detail here.
--
Cheers,
David / dhildenb
Powered by blists - more mailing lists