[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZofK+7Q8+TCdKe+a@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2024 11:29:15 +0100
From: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>
To: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@...ngson.cn>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] hw_breakpoint: Save privilege of access control
via ptrace
On Thu, Jul 04, 2024 at 10:47:59PM +0800, Tiezhu Yang wrote:
> On 6/21/24 15:39, Tiezhu Yang wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Thank you very much for your feedbacks in the v1 patch.
> > This series is based on 6.10-rc4, cross compile tested only.
> >
> > As far as I can tell, these changes are not relevant with tools/perf,
> > on some archs such as ARM, ARM64 and LoongArch which have privilege
> > level of breakpoint, the initial aim is to make use of the value of
> > ctrl->privilege saved in decode_ctrl_reg() and then remove the check
> > whether bp virtual address is in kernel space to assign value for
> > hw->ctrl.privilege in arch_build_bp_info().
> >
> > v2:
> > -- Put the new member "bp_priv" at the end of the uapi
> > struct perf_event_attr and add PERF_ATTR_SIZE_VER9.
> > -- Update the commit message to make the goal clear.
> >
> > Tiezhu Yang (3):
> > perf: Add perf_event_attr::bp_priv
> > arm: hw_breakpoint: Save privilege of access control via ptrace
> > arm64: hw_breakpoint: Save privilege of access control via ptrace
> >
> > arch/arm/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c | 4 +---
> > arch/arm/kernel/ptrace.c | 2 ++
> > arch/arm64/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c | 11 ++---------
> > arch/arm64/kernel/ptrace.c | 2 ++
> > include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h | 3 +++
> > kernel/events/hw_breakpoint.c | 1 +
> > 6 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> Ping, any more comments? Is it possible to merge this series
> for the coming merge window?
Maybe someone who knows the perf stuff can review it and give an
opinion?
--
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 80Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists