[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4d8731a21b3a040b92f862efd7032b1823f11235.camel@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 04 Jul 2024 21:51:54 -0400
From: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@...hat.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>, Paolo Bonzini
<pbonzini@...hat.com>, Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Hou Wenlong
<houwenlong.hwl@...group.com>, Kechen Lu <kechenl@...dia.com>, Oliver Upton
<oliver.upton@...ux.dev>, Binbin Wu <binbin.wu@...ux.intel.com>, Yang
Weijiang <weijiang.yang@...el.com>, Robert Hoo <robert.hoo.linux@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 31/49] KVM: x86: Move kvm_find_cpuid_entry{,_index}()
up near cpuid_entry2_find()
On Fri, 2024-05-17 at 10:39 -0700, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> Move kvm_find_cpuid_entry{,_index}() "up" in cpuid.c so that they are
> colocated with cpuid_entry2_find(), e.g. to make it easier to see the
> effective guts of the helpers without having to bounce around cpuid.c.
>
> No functional change intended.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c | 28 ++++++++++++++--------------
> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c b/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
> index 0526f25a7c80..d7390ade1c29 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
> @@ -175,6 +175,20 @@ static struct kvm_cpuid_entry2 *cpuid_entry2_find(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> return NULL;
> }
>
> +struct kvm_cpuid_entry2 *kvm_find_cpuid_entry_index(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> + u32 function, u32 index)
> +{
> + return cpuid_entry2_find(vcpu, function, index);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_find_cpuid_entry_index);
> +
> +struct kvm_cpuid_entry2 *kvm_find_cpuid_entry(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> + u32 function)
> +{
> + return cpuid_entry2_find(vcpu, function, KVM_CPUID_INDEX_NOT_SIGNIFICANT);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_find_cpuid_entry);
> +
> static int kvm_check_cpuid(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> {
> struct kvm_cpuid_entry2 *best;
> @@ -1511,20 +1525,6 @@ int kvm_dev_ioctl_get_cpuid(struct kvm_cpuid2 *cpuid,
> return r;
> }
>
> -struct kvm_cpuid_entry2 *kvm_find_cpuid_entry_index(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> - u32 function, u32 index)
> -{
> - return cpuid_entry2_find(vcpu, function, index);
> -}
> -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_find_cpuid_entry_index);
> -
> -struct kvm_cpuid_entry2 *kvm_find_cpuid_entry(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> - u32 function)
> -{
> - return cpuid_entry2_find(vcpu, function, KVM_CPUID_INDEX_NOT_SIGNIFICANT);
> -}
> -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_find_cpuid_entry);
> -
> /*
> * Intel CPUID semantics treats any query for an out-of-range leaf as if the
> * highest basic leaf (i.e. CPUID.0H:EAX) were requested. AMD CPUID semantics
Makes sense.
Reviewed-by: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@...hat.com>
Best regards,
Maxim Levitsky
Powered by blists - more mailing lists