lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANiq72=A-PZ6LoUiVQuOvN2hMVvd5pJ42OKPW61FXNrnYU+WBg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2024 15:46:35 +0200
From: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
To: Fabian Grünbichler <debian@...ian.gruenbichler.email>
Cc: Andrea Righi <righi.andrea@...il.com>, Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>, 
	Wedson Almeida Filho <wedsonaf@...il.com>, Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@...il.com>, 
	Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>, Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>, 
	Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>, 
	Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@...ton.me>, Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...sung.com>, 
	Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>, rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev, 
	Jan Alexander Steffens <heftig@...hlinux.org>, Johannes Löthberg <johannes@...iasis.com>, 
	Josh Stone <jistone@...hat.com>, Randy Barlow <randy@...ctronsweatshop.com>, 
	Anna Figueiredo Gomes <navi@...l.dev>, Matoro Mahri <matoro_gentoo@...oro.tk>, 
	Ryan Scheel <ryan.havvy@...il.com>, figsoda <figsoda@...me>, 
	Jörg Thalheim <joerg@...lheim.io>, 
	Theodore Ni <43ngvg@...qt.com>, Winter <nixos@...ter.cafe>, William Brown <wbrown@...e.de>, 
	Xiaoguang Wang <xiaoguang.wang@...e.com>, Zixing Liu <zixing.liu@...onical.com>, 
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, workflows@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/13] docs: rust: quick-start: add section on Linux distributions

On Fri, Jul 5, 2024 at 3:09 PM Fabian Grünbichler
<debian@...ian.gruenbichler.email> wrote:
>
> right now it is updated whenever its rdeps (firefox and chromium in
> stable) need newer versions. once e.g. a stable Debian kernel has
> similar requirements, I guess the same would apply there. I am not sure
> upstream kernel development on Debian stable would be enough of an
> argument to update it (or provide similar packages), but I am not a
> member of the teams that would make that decision.

That is reasonable.

> as discussed off-list, -backports might be a better place for providing
> more recent toolchain packages on Debian stable, and independent from
> this thread, I have pondered providing them there in the past already.
> backports would only ship one version as well though, and at most the
> one in testing (so it would also be affected by the freeze period, just
> like unstable and testing).

I imagine that could be useful for some (kernel or not) developers on
stable, even with the freeze period.

Thanks!

Cheers,
Miguel

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ