[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240705160816.GC18551@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2024 18:08:17 +0200
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Rachel Menge <rachelmenge@...ux.microsoft.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, rcu@...r.kernel.org,
Wei Fu <fuweid89@...il.com>, apais@...ux.microsoft.com,
Sudhanva Huruli <Sudhanva.Huruli@...rosoft.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>,
Mike Christie <michael.christie@...cle.com>,
Joel Granados <j.granados@...sung.com>,
Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@...il.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraj.upadhyay@...nel.org>,
Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>,
Zqiang <qiang.zhang1211@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] zap_pid_ns_processes: don't send SIGKILL to sub-threads
On 06/13, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>
> Well, if SIGNAL_GROUP_EXIT is set we do not care if this process was
> killed or not. It (the whole thread group) is going to exit, that is all.
OOPS. I forgot again that you removed SIGNAL_GROUP_COREDUMP and thus
we can't rely on SIGNAL_GROUP_EXIT in this case.
I still think this was not right, but it is too late to complain.
Andrew, please drop this patch.
Currently zap_pid_ns_processes() kills the coredumping tasks, with this
patch it doesn't.
Oleg.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists