| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <202407060025.WIFWw7WY-lkp@intel.com>
Date: Sat, 6 Jul 2024 00:56:15 +0800
From: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
To: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: llvm@...ts.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev,
Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>,
Muchun Song <muchun.song@...ux.dev>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>, SeongJae Park <sj@...nel.org>,
Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>,
Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/45] mm/pagewalk: Enable walk_pmd_range to handle
cont-pmds
Hi Oscar,
kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:
[auto build test ERROR on akpm-mm/mm-everything]
[also build test ERROR on sj/damon/next powerpc/next powerpc/fixes linus/master v6.10-rc6 next-20240703]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Oscar-Salvador/arch-x86-Drop-own-definition-of-pgd-p4d_leaf/20240705-042640
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm.git mm-everything
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240704043132.28501-6-osalvador%40suse.de
patch subject: [PATCH 05/45] mm/pagewalk: Enable walk_pmd_range to handle cont-pmds
config: um-allnoconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240706/202407060025.WIFWw7WY-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 17.0.6 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 6009708b4367171ccdbf4b5905cb6a803753fe18)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240706/202407060025.WIFWw7WY-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202407060025.WIFWw7WY-lkp@intel.com/
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
In file included from mm/pagewalk.c:3:
In file included from include/linux/highmem.h:12:
In file included from include/linux/hardirq.h:11:
In file included from arch/um/include/asm/hardirq.h:5:
In file included from include/asm-generic/hardirq.h:17:
In file included from include/linux/irq.h:20:
In file included from include/linux/io.h:14:
In file included from arch/um/include/asm/io.h:24:
include/asm-generic/io.h:548:31: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
548 | val = __raw_readb(PCI_IOBASE + addr);
| ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:561:61: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
561 | val = __le16_to_cpu((__le16 __force)__raw_readw(PCI_IOBASE + addr));
| ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/uapi/linux/byteorder/little_endian.h:37:51: note: expanded from macro '__le16_to_cpu'
37 | #define __le16_to_cpu(x) ((__force __u16)(__le16)(x))
| ^
In file included from mm/pagewalk.c:3:
In file included from include/linux/highmem.h:12:
In file included from include/linux/hardirq.h:11:
In file included from arch/um/include/asm/hardirq.h:5:
In file included from include/asm-generic/hardirq.h:17:
In file included from include/linux/irq.h:20:
In file included from include/linux/io.h:14:
In file included from arch/um/include/asm/io.h:24:
include/asm-generic/io.h:574:61: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
574 | val = __le32_to_cpu((__le32 __force)__raw_readl(PCI_IOBASE + addr));
| ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/uapi/linux/byteorder/little_endian.h:35:51: note: expanded from macro '__le32_to_cpu'
35 | #define __le32_to_cpu(x) ((__force __u32)(__le32)(x))
| ^
In file included from mm/pagewalk.c:3:
In file included from include/linux/highmem.h:12:
In file included from include/linux/hardirq.h:11:
In file included from arch/um/include/asm/hardirq.h:5:
In file included from include/asm-generic/hardirq.h:17:
In file included from include/linux/irq.h:20:
In file included from include/linux/io.h:14:
In file included from arch/um/include/asm/io.h:24:
include/asm-generic/io.h:585:33: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
585 | __raw_writeb(value, PCI_IOBASE + addr);
| ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:595:59: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
595 | __raw_writew((u16 __force)cpu_to_le16(value), PCI_IOBASE + addr);
| ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:605:59: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
605 | __raw_writel((u32 __force)cpu_to_le32(value), PCI_IOBASE + addr);
| ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:693:20: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
693 | readsb(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
| ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:701:20: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
701 | readsw(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
| ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:709:20: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
709 | readsl(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
| ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:718:21: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
718 | writesb(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
| ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:727:21: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
727 | writesw(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
| ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:736:21: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
736 | writesl(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
| ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
>> mm/pagewalk.c:91:11: error: call to undeclared function 'pmd_cont_addr_end'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
91 | next = pmd_cont_addr_end(addr, end);
| ^
12 warnings and 1 error generated.
vim +/pmd_cont_addr_end +91 mm/pagewalk.c
75
76 static int walk_pmd_range(pud_t *pud, unsigned long addr, unsigned long end,
77 struct mm_walk *walk)
78 {
79 pmd_t *pmd;
80 unsigned long next;
81 const struct mm_walk_ops *ops = walk->ops;
82 int err = 0;
83 int depth = real_depth(3);
84 int cont_pmds;
85
86 pmd = pmd_offset(pud, addr);
87 do {
88 again:
89 if (pmd_cont(*pmd)) {
90 cont_pmds = CONT_PMDS;
> 91 next = pmd_cont_addr_end(addr, end);
92 } else {
93 cont_pmds = 1;
94 next = pmd_addr_end(addr, end);
95 }
96 if (pmd_none(*pmd)) {
97 if (ops->pte_hole)
98 err = ops->pte_hole(addr, next, depth, walk);
99 if (err)
100 break;
101 continue;
102 }
103
104 walk->action = ACTION_SUBTREE;
105
106 /*
107 * This implies that each ->pmd_entry() handler
108 * needs to know about pmd_trans_huge() pmds
109 */
110 if (ops->pmd_entry)
111 err = ops->pmd_entry(pmd, addr, next, walk);
112 if (err)
113 break;
114
115 if (walk->action == ACTION_AGAIN)
116 goto again;
117
118 /*
119 * Check this here so we only break down trans_huge
120 * pages when we _need_ to
121 */
122 if ((!walk->vma && (pmd_leaf(*pmd) || !pmd_present(*pmd))) ||
123 walk->action == ACTION_CONTINUE ||
124 !(ops->pte_entry))
125 continue;
126
127 if (walk->vma)
128 split_huge_pmd(walk->vma, pmd, addr);
129
130 err = walk_pte_range(pmd, addr, next, walk);
131 if (err)
132 break;
133
134 if (walk->action == ACTION_AGAIN)
135 goto again;
136 } while (pmd += cont_pmds, addr = next, addr != end);
137
138 return err;
139 }
140
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
Powered by blists - more mailing lists