[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID:
<MA0P287MB02174EF48B5319A27F256AE4B8D82@MA0P287MB0217.INDP287.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
Date: Sat, 6 Jul 2024 10:20:19 +0000
From: Aditya Garg <gargaditya08@...e.com>
To: "gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
CC: "oneukum@...e.com" <oneukum@...e.com>, "stern@...land.harvard.edu"
<stern@...land.harvard.edu>, Kerem Karabay <kekrby@...il.com>, Orlando
Chamberlain <orlandoch.dev@...il.com>, Linux Kernel Mailing List
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-usb@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>, "usb-storage@...ts.one-eyed-alien.net"
<usb-storage@...ts.one-eyed-alien.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] scsi: usb: uas: Implement the new shutdown
callback
> On 6 Jul 2024, at 3:39 PM, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jul 06, 2024 at 10:01:38AM +0000, Aditya Garg wrote:
>> From: Kerem Karabay <kekrby@...il.com>
>>
>> This patch implements the new shutdown callback method added to
>> usb_driver on the UAS driver.
>
> Again, says what it does, but not why.
>
A standard implementation of shutdown callback has been implemented
for USB drivers. Since the UAS driver implements a shutdown callback
this patch enables it to use the new standard implementation.
Now looks fine?
Is the body of the first patch fine?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists