linux-kernel - Re: [syzbot] [lsm?] general protection fault in hook_inode_free

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <202407081222.D8E3CAEC@keescook>
Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2024 12:25:24 -0700
From: Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org>
To: Mickaël Salaün <mic@...ikod.net>
Cc: Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>, Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
	Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>,
	syzbot <syzbot+5446fbf332b0602ede0b@...kaller.appspotmail.com>,
	jmorris@...ei.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, serge@...lyn.com,
	syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [syzbot] [lsm?] general protection fault in
 hook_inode_free_security

On Mon, Jul 08, 2024 at 04:02:34PM +0200, Mickaël Salaün wrote:
> I think your patch is correct though.  Could you please send a full
> patch?

Can you take it over? I don't have an immediate reproducer, etc. I think
it'd be best for the changes to go along with fixes for Landlock and Smack.

-- 
Kees Cook