lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5153b8f8a6c6ffdc1254e00c47a888ed.sboyd@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 08 Jul 2024 15:30:22 -0700
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
To: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>, Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>, Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>
Cc: Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] clk: qocm: add qcom_cc_map_norequest

Quoting Dmitry Baryshkov (2024-06-27 22:20:22)
> The GPU clock controllers use memory region that is a part of the GMU's
> memory region. Add qcom_cc_map_norequest() to be used by GPUCC, so that
> GPU driver can use devm_ioremap_resource for GMU resources.

Why does GMU map the gpu clk controller? Does it use those registers? We
don't want to allow two different drivers to map the same region because
then they don't coordinate and write over things.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ