[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMRc=McLpG2yfuaEwwdd8+HTJbhKLqE5hqbbyV36SiXWT_+Maw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2024 09:56:07 +0200
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>, "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 0/4] net: phy: aquantia: enable support for aqr115c
On Sat, Jul 6, 2024 at 8:26 PM Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jul 6, 2024 at 7:11 PM Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl> wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, Jul 6, 2024 at 2:04 AM Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, 3 Jul 2024 20:11:27 +0200 Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> > > > [PATCH net-next v3 0/4] net: phy: aquantia: enable support for aqr115c
> > >
> > > Doesn't seem to apply:
> > >
> > > Applying: net: phy: aquantia: rename and export aqr107_wait_reset_complete()
> > > error: patch failed: drivers/net/phy/aquantia/aquantia.h:201
> > > error: drivers/net/phy/aquantia/aquantia.h: patch does not apply
> > > Patch failed at 0001 net: phy: aquantia: rename and export aqr107_wait_reset_complete()
> > > hint: Use 'git am --show-current-patch=diff' to see the failed patch
> > > hint: When you have resolved this problem, run "git am --continue".
> > > hint: If you prefer to skip this patch, run "git am --skip" instead.
> > > hint: To restore the original branch and stop patching, run "git am --abort".
> > > hint: Disable this message with "git config advice.mergeConflict false"
> > > --
> > > pw-bot: cr
> >
> > It conflicts with the fix I sent separately to add include guards that
> > I had in my branch as well. I'll resend it.
> >
> > Bart
>
> Actually this conflicts with commit 61578f679378 ("net: phy: aquantia:
> add support for PHY LEDs") that was applied to net-next recently. The
> resolution is trivial - just leave both sides as they are. Can you
> resolve it when applying or do you want a new version after all?
>
> Bart
Nevermind, I resent this version rebased on top of today's net-next.
Bart
Powered by blists - more mailing lists