linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] mul_u64_u64_div

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <nrss95p0-3s44-6q04-9onp-nq07n001075q@syhkavp.arg>
Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2024 08:43:16 -0400 (EDT)
From: Nicolas Pitre <nico@...xnic.net>
To: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...libre.com>
cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] mul_u64_u64_div_u64: basic sanity test

On Mon, 8 Jul 2024, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:

> Hello,
> 
> On Sun, Jul 07, 2024 at 03:05:20PM -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> > +static void __exit test_exit(void)
> > +{
> > +}
> > +
> > +module_init(test_init);
> > +module_exit(test_exit);
> 
> Can module_exit() and test_exit() just be dropped?

I suppose. All the test modules I've looked at also have that empty exit 
method. Maybe dropping them all separately?


Nicolas