linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] firmware: cs_dsp: Use strnlen() on name fields in V1 wmfw files

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <27d74268-53ff-4248-8d3d-71948ffcf68b@opensource.cirrus.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2024 16:22:46 +0100
From: Richard Fitzgerald <rf@...nsource.cirrus.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
CC: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <patches@...nsource.cirrus.com>,
        <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>, <linux-sound@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] firmware: cs_dsp: Use strnlen() on name fields in V1 wmfw
 files

On 08/07/2024 16:05, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 08, 2024 at 04:00:07PM +0100, Richard Fitzgerald wrote:
> 
>> Don't take this. It applies to 6.11 but not to 6.10.
>> I'll try to sort out one that applies to new and old code, or
>> send separate 6.11 and backport versions.
> 
>> Sorry about that.
> 
> git seemed to be able to figure out the context for 6.10 (I apply
> everything with am -3).

Oh, I read this just after I'd sent a V2. You can ignore my V2 if you've
got it to apply (it's the same patch but with a couple of conflicting
lines dropped from the context)