[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <81a93b15-2791-4eec-8164-f141fae9a5f1@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2024 11:01:12 -0500
From: Mario Limonciello <superm1@...nel.org>
To: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
Cc: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>,
Krzysztof Wilczyński <kw@...ux.com>,
Lukas Wunner <lukas@...ner.de>, Bert Karwatzki <spasswolf@....de>,
caleb.connolly@...aro.org, bhelgaas@...gle.com, amit.pundir@...aro.org,
neil.armstrong@...aro.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, Praveenkumar Patil <PraveenKumar.Patil@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] pci: bus: only call of_platform_populate() if
CONFIG_OF is enabled
On 7/8/2024 10:58, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 8, 2024 at 5:53 PM Mario Limonciello <superm1@...nel.org> wrote:
>>
>> On 7/8/2024 10:49, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> If you have CONFIG_OF enabled then of_platform_populate() will go the
>>> normal path and actually try to populate sub-nodes of the host bridge
>>> node. If there are no OF nodes (not a device-tree system) then it will
>>> fail.
>>>
>>> Bart
>>
>> So how about keep both patches then?
>
> No, it doesn't make sense. If CONFIG_OF is enabled then -ENODEV is a
> valid error. I was wrong to apply the previous patch as it would lead
> to hiding actual errors on OF-enabled systems.
>
> Bart
Got it; thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists