[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20240709141417.3349-1-sensor1010@163.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2024 07:14:17 -0700
From: Lizhe <sensor1010@....com>
To: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
rafael@...nel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Lizhe <sensor1010@....com>
Subject: [PATCH v3] driver:core: no need to invert the return value of the call_driver_probe()
In the probe function (either drv->bus->probe() or drv->probe()),
there is no return value of EPROBE_DEFER. the error return from probe
should be -EPROBE_DEFER, hence no negation of call_driver_probe()'s
return is needed, nor should there be an EPROBE_DEFER check in
driver_probe_device()
Signed-off-by: Lizhe <sensor1010@....com>
v3:
Modify commit message and versions go below the ---
v2:
Delete the judgment with the return value of EPROBEDEFER
from the _driver_probe.device()
v1:
Add the judgment with the return value of EPROBEDEFER
from the _driver_probe.device()
---
drivers/base/dd.c | 7 +------
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/base/dd.c b/drivers/base/dd.c
index 83d352394fdf..d047919d1f5e 100644
--- a/drivers/base/dd.c
+++ b/drivers/base/dd.c
@@ -664,11 +664,6 @@ static int really_probe(struct device *dev, struct device_driver *drv)
if (link_ret == -EAGAIN)
ret = -EPROBE_DEFER;
- /*
- * Return probe errors as positive values so that the callers
- * can distinguish them from other errors.
- */
- ret = -ret;
goto probe_failed;
}
@@ -826,7 +821,7 @@ static int driver_probe_device(struct device_driver *drv, struct device *dev)
atomic_inc(&probe_count);
ret = __driver_probe_device(drv, dev);
- if (ret == -EPROBE_DEFER || ret == EPROBE_DEFER) {
+ if (ret == -EPROBE_DEFER) {
driver_deferred_probe_add(dev);
/*
--
2.17.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists