[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <978add3e-754c-4519-a511-117051519a70@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2024 19:56:57 +0530
From: Donet Tom <donettom@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Muchun Song <muchun.song@...ux.dev>,
"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Ritesh Harjani <ritesh.list@...il.com>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>, David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Tony Battersby
<tonyb@...ernetics.com>,
"Aneesh Kumar K . V" <aneesh.kumar@...nel.org>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c: Ensure
generic_hugetlb_get_unmapped_area() returns higher address than mmap_min_addr
On 7/9/24 19:32, Oscar Salvador wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 09, 2024 at 07:14:38PM +0530, Donet Tom wrote:
>> Thank you Oscar.
> Hi Donet,
>
>> The issue I am trying to fix will also get fixed by this new changes right.
>> So should we drop my patch or should we continue it?
> I would keep this patch as it is easier to backport as a small fixup.
OK thanks.
>
> Thanks
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists