linux-kernel - Re: FYI: path walking optimizations pending for 6.11

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHk-=wgAKfXySpKFcJUdv97Rqz7RxPF-uc6xsue6Oiy=tP65oA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2024 07:28:19 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Cc: Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>, Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, 
	linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>, "the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@...nel.org>, 
	Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, 
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: FYI: path walking optimizations pending for 6.11

On Tue, 9 Jul 2024 at 03:04, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com> wrote:
>
> Looking at the arm64 runtime constants patch, I see there's a redundant
> store in __runtime_fixup_16(), which I think is just a leftover from
> applying the last roudn or feedback:

Duh, yes.

> For the sake of review, would you be happy to post the uaccess and
> runtime-constants patches to the list again? I think there might be some
> remaining issues with (real) PAN and we might need to do a bit more
> preparatory work there.

Sure. I'll fix that silly left-over store, and post again.

           Linus