[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4729a8ba-655d-4127-9f14-33b4521b4442@linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2024 16:44:30 +0200
From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
To: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>,
Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@...goat.com>
Cc: Aleksandar Rikalo <aleksandar.rikalo@...mia.com>,
Aleksandar Rikalo <arikalo@...il.com>, Chao-ying Fu <cfu@...ecomp.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>, Greg Ungerer <gerg@...nel.org>,
Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@...ke-m.de>,
Ilya Lipnitskiy <ilya.lipnitskiy@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"linux-mips@...r.kernel.org" <linux-mips@...r.kernel.org>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>, "paulburton@...nel.org"
<paulburton@...nel.org>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@...il.com>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@...ngson.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 07/14] clocksource: mips-gic-timer: Always use cluster
0 counter as clocksource
On 09/07/2024 10:53, Thomas Bogendoerfer wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 09, 2024 at 09:47:52AM +0800, Jiaxun Yang wrote:
>>
>>
>> 在2024年7月9日七月 上午12:36,Daniel Lezcano写道:
>>> On 11/05/2024 12:43, Aleksandar Rikalo wrote:
>>>> From: Paul Burton <paulburton@...nel.org>
>>>>
>>>> In a multi-cluster MIPS system we have multiple GICs - one in each
>>>> cluster - each of which has its own independent counter. The counters in
>>>> each GIC are not synchronised in any way, so they can drift relative to
>>>> one another through the lifetime of the system. This is problematic for
>>>> a clocksource which ought to be global.
>>>>
>>>> Avoid problems by always accessing cluster 0's counter, using
>>>> cross-cluster register access. This adds overhead so we only do so on
>>>> systems where we actually have CPUs present in multiple clusters.
>>>> For now, be extra conservative and don't use gic counter for vdso or
>>>> sched_clock in this case.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Paul Burton <paulburton@...nel.org>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Chao-ying Fu <cfu@...ecomp.com>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Dragan Mladjenovic <dragan.mladjenovic@...mia.com>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Aleksandar Rikalo <aleksandar.rikalo@...mia.com>
>>>> ---
>>>
>>> Applied patch 7 and 8
>>
>> I think it won't compile without patch 1 being applid.
>>
>> Thomas, do you mind to apply patch 1 for now? Given that it's just some extra
>> function definitions.
>
> no problem, I've applied patch 1 und 2 to mips-next.
Usually we create a shared immutable branch, but as we are close to the
PR, I propose I ack these two patches and let them go through the mips
tree this time
--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists