[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240709160615.998336-3-ojeda@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2024 18:05:57 +0200
From: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>
To: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>,
Wedson Almeida Filho <wedsonaf@...il.com>,
Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@...il.com>
Cc: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>,
Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>,
Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@...ton.me>,
Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...sung.com>,
Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>,
rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
patches@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: [PATCH v2 02/13] rust: init: simplify from `map_err` to `inspect_err`
A new complexity lint, `manual_inspect` [1], has been introduced in
the upcoming Rust 1.81 (currently in nightly), which checks for uses of
`map*` which return the original item:
error:
--> rust/kernel/init.rs:846:23
|
846 | (self.1)(val).map_err(|e| {
| ^^^^^^^
|
= help: for further information visit https://rust-lang.github.io/rust-clippy/master/index.html#manual_inspect
= note: `-D clippy::manual-inspect` implied by `-D warnings`
= help: to override `-D warnings` add `#[allow(clippy::manual_inspect)]`
help: try
|
846 ~ (self.1)(val).inspect_err(|e| {
847 | // SAFETY: `slot` was initialized above.
848 ~ unsafe { core::ptr::drop_in_place(slot) };
|
Thus clean them up.
Link: https://rust-lang.github.io/rust-clippy/master/index.html#/manual_inspect [1]
Tested-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@...ton.me>
Tested-by: Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...sung.com>
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>
---
v2:
- Moved `SAFETY` comment out of the closure, in one of the instances
only. In the other, it would mean putting two `SAFETY` comments in
a row, which is even more confusing. Open coding it may be clearer,
though -- happy to get a patch for that later on (with some docs
about guidelines for using or avoiding `inspect_*`). (Björn, Benno,
Alice)
rust/kernel/init.rs | 13 ++++---------
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/rust/kernel/init.rs b/rust/kernel/init.rs
index 68605b633e73..495c09ebe3a3 100644
--- a/rust/kernel/init.rs
+++ b/rust/kernel/init.rs
@@ -843,11 +843,8 @@ unsafe fn __pinned_init(self, slot: *mut T) -> Result<(), E> {
let val = unsafe { &mut *slot };
// SAFETY: `slot` is considered pinned.
let val = unsafe { Pin::new_unchecked(val) };
- (self.1)(val).map_err(|e| {
- // SAFETY: `slot` was initialized above.
- unsafe { core::ptr::drop_in_place(slot) };
- e
- })
+ // SAFETY: `slot` was initialized above.
+ (self.1)(val).inspect_err(|_| unsafe { core::ptr::drop_in_place(slot) })
}
}
@@ -941,11 +938,9 @@ unsafe fn __init(self, slot: *mut T) -> Result<(), E> {
// SAFETY: All requirements fulfilled since this function is `__init`.
unsafe { self.0.__pinned_init(slot)? };
// SAFETY: The above call initialized `slot` and we still have unique access.
- (self.1)(unsafe { &mut *slot }).map_err(|e| {
+ (self.1)(unsafe { &mut *slot }).inspect_err(|_|
// SAFETY: `slot` was initialized above.
- unsafe { core::ptr::drop_in_place(slot) };
- e
- })
+ unsafe { core::ptr::drop_in_place(slot) })
}
}
--
2.45.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists