[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f92269eb-3664-42ae-83a7-8eb0a3af3f08@linux.dev>
Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2024 02:12:50 +0200
From: Zhu Yanjun <yanjun.zhu@...ux.dev>
To: John Garry <john.g.garry@...cle.com>, axboe@...nel.dk, mst@...hat.com,
jasowang@...hat.com, xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com, eperezma@...hat.com,
pbonzini@...hat.com, stefanha@...hat.com, hare@...e.de, kbusch@...nel.org,
hch@....de
Cc: linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] null_blk: Don't bother validating blocksize
在 2024/7/8 11:16, John Garry 写道:
> The block queue limits validation does this for us now.
>
> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
> Signed-off-by: John Garry <john.g.garry@...cle.com>
> ---
> drivers/block/null_blk/main.c | 3 ---
> 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/block/null_blk/main.c b/drivers/block/null_blk/main.c
> index 9d0f6da77601..2f0431e42c49 100644
> --- a/drivers/block/null_blk/main.c
> +++ b/drivers/block/null_blk/main.c
> @@ -1831,9 +1831,6 @@ static int null_validate_conf(struct nullb_device *dev)
> dev->queue_mode = NULL_Q_MQ;
> }
>
> - if (blk_validate_block_size(dev->blocksize))
> - return -EINVAL;
Reviewed-by: Zhu Yanjun <yanjun.zhu@...ux.dev>
Thanks,
Zhu Yanjun
> -
> if (dev->use_per_node_hctx) {
> if (dev->submit_queues != nr_online_nodes)
> dev->submit_queues = nr_online_nodes;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists