lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Zo13PB-fZ8B9WEYy@boqun-archlinux>
Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2024 10:45:32 -0700
From: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
	Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>,
	Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>,
	Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@...il.com>,
	Wedson Almeida Filho <wedsonaf@...il.com>,
	Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>,
	Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>,
	Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@...ton.me>,
	Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...sung.com>,
	Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>,
	rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org,
	Manos Pitsidianakis <manos.pitsidianakis@...aro.org>,
	Erik Schilling <erik.schilling@...aro.org>,
	Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@...aro.org>,
	Joakim Bech <joakim.bech@...aro.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH V3 1/8] rust: Add initial bindings for OPP framework

On Tue, Jul 09, 2024 at 04:32:45PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 03-07-24, 08:34, Boqun Feng wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 03, 2024 at 12:44:26PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > > +// SAFETY: `OPP` only holds a pointer to a C OPP, which is safe to be used from any thread.
> > > +unsafe impl Send for OPP {}
> > > +
> > > +// SAFETY: `OPP` only holds a pointer to a C OPP, references to which are safe to be used from any
> > > +// thread.
> > > +unsafe impl Sync for OPP {}
> > > +
> > 
> > Same for the above safety comments, as they are still based on the old
> > implementation.
> 
> Do I still need to change these ? Since we aren't always using ARef
> now.
> 

Correct, you will still need to change these. You're welcome to submit
a draft version here and I can help take a look before you send out a
whole new version, if you prefer that way.

Regards,
Boqun

> -- 
> viresh

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ