lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240709182054.GJ14050@ziepe.ca>
Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2024 15:20:54 -0300
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>
To: Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, iommu@...ts.linux.dev,
	linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
	Rob Clark <robdclark@...omium.org>, Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
	Steven Price <steven.price@....com>,
	Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...labora.com>,
	Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@...el.com>,
	Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@...cle.com>,
	"moderated list:ARM SMMU DRIVERS" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] iommu/io-pgtable-arm: Add way to debug pgtable
 walk

On Wed, Jul 03, 2024 at 09:18:43AM -0700, Rob Clark wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 3, 2024 at 8:02 AM Will Deacon <will@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Rob,
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 26, 2024 at 01:40:26PM -0700, Rob Clark wrote:
> > > From: Rob Clark <robdclark@...omium.org>
> > >
> > > Add an io-pgtable method to walk the pgtable returning the raw PTEs that
> > > would be traversed for a given iova access.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@...omium.org>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
> > >  include/linux/io-pgtable.h     | 16 ++++++++++++++++
> > >  2 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> >
> > Non-technical question, but with patch 2/2 being drm-specific, how do
> > you plan to get this merged this once it's finalised? I can take this
> > part via the IOMMU tree?
> 
> I guess if need be, I could merge the drm part only after the iommu
> part lands.  We've lived with an earlier iteration of these series as
> downstream patches in the CrOS kernel for this long, it isn't the end
> of the world if it takes a bit longer

We should try not to split series up, there are too many cases where
the other parts don't make it and we end up with some cruft.

This is only two patches, get iommu or DRM to ack their parts and send
it through one tree.

Jason

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ