lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <256827bfb6f7084d337677bf1c03bc61.sboyd@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2024 12:49:26 -0700
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
To: Jeff Johnson <quic_jjohnson@...cinc.com>, Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev, kunit-dev@...glegroups.com, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Brendan Higgins <brendan.higgins@...ux.dev>, David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>, Rae Moar <rmoar@...gle.com>, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, Rafael J . Wysocki <rafael@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>, Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@...gle.com>, Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@...il.com>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Maxime Ripard <maxime@...no.tech>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 4/8] of: Add a KUnit test for overlays and test managed APIs

Quoting Jeff Johnson (2024-07-09 07:49:40)
> On 7/5/24 21:54, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > Test the KUnit test managed overlay APIs. Confirm that platform devices
> > are created and destroyed properly. This provides us confidence that the
> > test managed APIs work correctly and can be relied upon to provide tests
> > with fake platform devices and device nodes via overlays compiled into
> > the kernel image.
> 
> ...
> 
> > +kunit_test_suites(
> > +     &of_overlay_apply_kunit_suite,
> > +);
> > +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
> 
> Multiple patches in this series introduce new instances of 
> MODULE_LICENSE() without an accompanying MODULE_DESCRIPTION().
> 
> Building a module without a MODULE_DESCRIPTION() will result in a 
> warning when building with make W=1.

Thanks! I'll add it.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ