[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Zo2auA2r/hkJWWcs@gondor.apana.org.au>
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2024 08:16:56 +1200
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
To: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>
Cc: Fred Li <dracodingfly@...il.com>, aleksander.lobakin@...el.com,
andrii@...nel.org, ast@...nel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
daniel@...earbox.net, davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com,
haoluo@...gle.com, hawk@...nel.org, john.fastabend@...il.com,
jolsa@...nel.org, kpsingh@...nel.org, kuba@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux@...ssschuh.net,
martin.lau@...ux.dev, mkhalfella@...estorage.com, nbd@....name,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, sashal@...nel.org,
sdf@...gle.com, song@...nel.org, yonghong.song@...ux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: linearizing skb when downgrade gso_size
On Tue, Jul 09, 2024 at 11:53:21AM -0400, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
>
> > + /* Due to header grow, MSS needs to be downgraded.
> > + * There is BUG_ON When segment the frag_list with
> > + * head_frag true so linearize skb after downgrade
> > + * the MSS.
> > + */
This sounds completely wrong. You should never grow the TCP header
by changing gso_size. What is the usage-scenario for this?
Think about it, if a router forwards a TCP packet, and ends up
growing its TCP header and then splits the packet into two, then
this router is brain-dead.
Cheers,
--
Email: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
Powered by blists - more mailing lists