linux-kernel - [PATCH 0/3] pinctrl: ti: ti-iodelay: Fix some error handling paths + 2 unrelated clean-ups

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <cover.1720556038.git.christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>
Date: Tue,  9 Jul 2024 22:37:42 +0200
From: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
To: linus.walleij@...aro.org,
	lokeshvutla@...com,
	nm@...com,
	robh@...nel.org,
	tony@...mide.com
Cc: linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
	Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
Subject: [PATCH 0/3] pinctrl: ti: ti-iodelay: Fix some error handling paths + 2 unrelated clean-ups

The first patch is completly speculative. It is based on static analysis
when a function is called in the remove() function, but not in the
error handling path of the probe.
When looking deeper at it, it seems that part of
ti_iodelay_pinconf_init_dev() also needed to be fixed.

/!\ This is completly speculative. So review with care /!\

Patch 2 and 3 are just constification patches spoted while looking at
the code.

Christophe JAILLET (3):
  pinctrl: ti: ti-iodelay: Fix some error handling paths
  pinctrl: ti: ti-iodelay: Constify struct ti_iodelay_reg_data
  pinctrl: ti: ti-iodelay: Constify struct regmap_config

 drivers/pinctrl/ti/pinctrl-ti-iodelay.c | 58 ++++++++++---------------
 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)

-- 
2.45.2