linux-kernel - Re: CVE-2023-52628: netfilter: nftables: exthdr: fix 4-byte stack OOB write

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2024070926-removing-chewer-2426@gregkh>
Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2024 07:19:59 +0200
From: "gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Siddh Raman Pant <siddh.raman.pant@...cle.com>
Cc: "cve@...nel.org" <cve@...nel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: CVE-2023-52628: netfilter: nftables: exthdr: fix 4-byte stack
 OOB write

On Tue, Jul 09, 2024 at 03:48:29AM +0000, Siddh Raman Pant wrote:
> Is this a duplicate of CVE-2023-4881? It was rejected with the reason:
> 
> > https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2023-4881
> >
> > ** REJECT ** CVE-2023-4881 was wrongly assigned to a bug that was
> > deemed to be a non-security issue by the Linux kernel security team.

I don't know, where is the information about that older rejected issue?
If this isn't an issue, we will be glad to reject it.

thanks,

greg k-h