lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0df5a4c7-65c3-45ea-b245-3ab872db8d96@linux.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2024 13:27:51 +0800
From: "Mi, Dapeng" <dapeng1.mi@...ux.intel.com>
To: "Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>,
 Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
 Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>, Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>,
 Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
 Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 Yongwei Ma <yongwei.ma@...el.com>, Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [Patch v2 5/5] perf tests: Add topdown events counting and
 sampling tests


On 7/8/2024 9:40 PM, Liang, Kan wrote:
>
> On 2024-07-08 10:42 a.m., Dapeng Mi wrote:
>> Add counting and leader sampling tests to verify topdown events including
>> raw format can be reordered correctly.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@...ux.intel.com>
>> ---
>>  tools/perf/tests/shell/record.sh | 6 ++++++
>>  tools/perf/tests/shell/stat.sh   | 6 ++++++
>>  2 files changed, 12 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/shell/record.sh b/tools/perf/tests/shell/record.sh
>> index 8e3e66780fed..164f0cf9648e 100755
>> --- a/tools/perf/tests/shell/record.sh
>> +++ b/tools/perf/tests/shell/record.sh
>> @@ -214,6 +214,12 @@ test_leader_sampling() {
>>      index=$(($index+1))
>>      prev_branches=$branches
>>    done < $script_output
> The topdown is a model specific feature and only be available for the
> big core.
>
> We need to check if topdown is supported before doing the test.
>
> The same check in the test_topdown_groups() may be used here as well.
>
>   if ! perf stat -e '{slots,topdown-retiring}' true > /dev/null 2>&1
>   then
>     echo "Topdown sampling read test [Skipped event parsing failed]"
>     return
>   fi

Sure. Thanks.

>
> Thanks,
> Kan
>
>> +  if ! perf record -o "${perfdata}" -e "{instructions,slots,topdown-retiring}:S" true 2> /dev/null
>> +  then
>> +    echo "Leader sampling [Failed topdown events not reordered correctly]"
>> +    err=1
>> +    return
>> +  fi
>>    echo "Basic leader sampling test [Success]"
>>  }
>>  
>> diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/shell/stat.sh b/tools/perf/tests/shell/stat.sh
>> index 3f1e67795490..092a7a2abcf8 100755
>> --- a/tools/perf/tests/shell/stat.sh
>> +++ b/tools/perf/tests/shell/stat.sh
>> @@ -79,6 +79,12 @@ test_topdown_groups() {
>>      err=1
>>      return
>>    fi
>> +  if perf stat -e '{instructions,r400,r8000}' true 2>&1 | grep -E -q "<not supported>"
>> +  then
>> +    echo "Topdown event group test [Failed raw format slots not reordered first]"
>> +    err=1
>> +    return
>> +  fi
>>    echo "Topdown event group test [Success]"
>>  }
>>  

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ