lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7hsewj76v9.fsf@baylibre.com>
Date: Mon, 08 Jul 2024 17:21:14 -0700
From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>, Bartosz
 Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
 Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Benoît Cousson
 <bcousson@...libre.com>, Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
 linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: ti: align panel timings node name with dtschema

Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org> writes:

> On 26/06/2024 13:47, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 26, 2024 at 1:26 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski
>> <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, 09 May 2024 12:48:13 +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>> DT schema expects panel timings node to follow certain pattern,
>>>> dtbs_check warnings:
>>>>
>>>>   am335x-pdu001.dtb: display-timings: '240x320p16' does not match any of the regexes: '^timing', 'pinctrl-[0-9]+'
>>>>
>>>> Linux drivers do not care about node name, so this should not have
>>>> effect on Linux.
>>>>
>>>> [...]
>>>
>>> 1.5 months on the lists, but maybe I combined too many separate TI maintainers,
>>> so no one feels responsible... then I guess I will take it.
>>>
>> 
>> Yeah next time you should probably at least split omap and davinci
>> bits into separate patches. Otherwise I think Tony thought I'd pick it
>> up and vice versa.
>
> I guess after you acked it, Tony would pick it up.
>
> Anyway, please let me know if I should drop the patch / resend / split etc.

There's a bit of a handover transition as I take over from Tony on the
omap stuff.  Sorry for the lag, but thanks for picking this up.

Kevin

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ