[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a41274c3-fd32-4eba-8240-bf95e41f63d9@microchip.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2024 06:13:21 +0000
From: <Varshini.Rajendran@...rochip.com>
To: <conor@...nel.org>
CC: <tglx@...utronix.de>, <robh@...nel.org>, <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
<conor+dt@...nel.org>, <Nicolas.Ferre@...rochip.com>,
<alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>, <claudiu.beznea@...on.dev>,
<Dharma.B@...rochip.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 15/27] dt-bindings: interrupt-controller: Document the
property microchip,nr-irqs
On 03/07/24 9:11 pm, Conor Dooley wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 03, 2024 at 03:58:14PM +0530, Varshini Rajendran wrote:
>> Add the description and conditions to the device tree documentation
>> for the property microchip,nr-irqs.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Varshini Rajendran<varshini.rajendran@...rochip.com>
> This needs to be part of patch 14.
>
>> ---
>> .../bindings/interrupt-controller/atmel,aic.yaml | 12 ++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/atmel,aic.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/atmel,aic.yaml
>> index 9c5af9dbcb6e..06e5f92e7d53 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/atmel,aic.yaml
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/atmel,aic.yaml
>> @@ -54,6 +54,10 @@ properties:
>> $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32-array
>> description: u32 array of external irqs.
>>
>> + microchip,nr-irqs:
>> + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32-array
>> + description: u32 array of nr_irqs.
> This makes no sense, did you just copy from above? Why would the number
> of irqs be an array? Why can't you determine this from the compatble?
>
Sorry for the bad description. I will correct it in the next version.
For the second part of the question, this change was done as a step to
resolve having a new compatible while having practically the same IP
pointed out in the v3 of the series [1]. It is kind of looping back to
the initial idea now. Even if this is added as a driver data, it
overrides the expectation from the comment in [1]. Please suggest. I
also read Rob's concerns on having a device tree property for number of
irqs.
[1]
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/87ee1e3c365686bc60e92ba3972dc1a5@kernel.org/
> Thanks,
> Conor.
>
>> +
>> allOf:
>> - $ref: /schemas/interrupt-controller.yaml#
>> - if:
>> @@ -71,6 +75,14 @@ allOf:
>> atmel,external-irqs:
>> minItems: 1
>> maxItems: 1
>> + - if:
>> + properties:
>> + compatible:
>> + contains:
>> + const: microchip,sam9x7-aic
>> + then:
>> + required:
>> + - microchip,nr-irqs
>>
>> required:
>> - compatible
>> --
>> 2.25.1
>>
--
Thanks and Regards,
Varshini Rajendran.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists