linux-kernel - linux-next: manual merge of the scsi-mkp tree with Linus' tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240709165708.3f8e3498@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2024 16:57:08 +1000
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Linux Next
 Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>, Nathan Chancellor
 <nathan@...nel.org>, Tomas Henzl <thenzl@...hat.com>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the scsi-mkp tree with Linus' tree

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the scsi-mkp tree got a conflict in:

  drivers/scsi/mpi3mr/mpi3mr_transport.c

between commit:

  9f365cb8bbd0 ("scsi: mpi3mr: Use proper format specifier in mpi3mr_sas_port_add()")

from Linus' tree and commit:

  de24085328c0 ("scsi: mpi3mr: Correct a test in mpi3mr_sas_port_add()")

from the scsi-mkp tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

diff --cc drivers/scsi/mpi3mr/mpi3mr_transport.c
index 82aa4e418c5a,27865ee896d7..000000000000
--- a/drivers/scsi/mpi3mr/mpi3mr_transport.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/mpi3mr/mpi3mr_transport.c
@@@ -1363,8 -1377,8 +1377,8 @@@ static struct mpi3mr_sas_port *mpi3mr_s
  		    (mr_sas_node->phy[i].hba_port != hba_port))
  			continue;

- 		if (i > sizeof(mr_sas_port->phy_mask) * 8) {
+ 		if (i >= sizeof(mr_sas_port->phy_mask) * 8) {
 -			ioc_warn(mrioc, "skipping port %u, max allowed value is %lu\n",
 +			ioc_warn(mrioc, "skipping port %u, max allowed value is %zu\n",
  			    i, sizeof(mr_sas_port->phy_mask) * 8);
  			goto out_fail;
  		}

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped