[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANiq72kEBCx=6Wab=0dSVkXeoYsR-=pYv7CA=8wJgVOxqwkiDQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2024 10:00:06 +0200
From: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
To: John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>
Cc: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>, Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
Nicolas Schier <nicolas@...sle.eu>, Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@...il.com>,
Wedson Almeida Filho <wedsonaf@...il.com>, Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>, Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>,
Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>,
Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@...ton.me>, Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...sung.com>,
Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>, Finn Behrens <me@...enk.dev>, linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org,
rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] Makefile: rust-analyzer better error handling, documentation
On Fri, Jun 28, 2024 at 2:44 AM John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com> wrote:
>
> Changes since v2:
>
> 1) Used wording suggested by Miguel Ojeda (thanks!) for the
> documentation patch.
>
> 2) Added review, testing, ack tags.
>
> Finn Behrens, thanks for your reviews, and please note that out of an
> excess of caution, I've only applied your reviewed-by tag to patch 2/2.
> For patch 1/2, the wording changed a lot after you reviewed it, so I
> couldn't quite convince myself that the review was still fair to claim.
Applied to `rust-next` -- thanks!
[ Reworded title. - Miguel ]
Cheers,
Miguel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists