[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <8b133053-247f-414b-9c01-e0e5291e347d@app.fastmail.com>
Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2024 09:47:52 +0800
From: "Jiaxun Yang" <jiaxun.yang@...goat.com>
To: "Daniel Lezcano" <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
"Aleksandar Rikalo" <aleksandar.rikalo@...mia.com>,
"Thomas Bogendoerfer" <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>
Cc: "Aleksandar Rikalo" <arikalo@...il.com>,
"Chao-ying Fu" <cfu@...ecomp.com>,
"Geert Uytterhoeven" <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
"Greg Ungerer" <gerg@...nel.org>, "Hauke Mehrtens" <hauke@...ke-m.de>,
"Ilya Lipnitskiy" <ilya.lipnitskiy@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"linux-mips@...r.kernel.org" <linux-mips@...r.kernel.org>,
"Marc Zyngier" <maz@...nel.org>,
"paulburton@...nel.org" <paulburton@...nel.org>,
"Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@...radead.org>,
"Serge Semin" <fancer.lancer@...il.com>,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"Tiezhu Yang" <yangtiezhu@...ngson.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 07/14] clocksource: mips-gic-timer: Always use cluster 0 counter
as clocksource
在2024年7月9日七月 上午12:36,Daniel Lezcano写道:
> On 11/05/2024 12:43, Aleksandar Rikalo wrote:
>> From: Paul Burton <paulburton@...nel.org>
>>
>> In a multi-cluster MIPS system we have multiple GICs - one in each
>> cluster - each of which has its own independent counter. The counters in
>> each GIC are not synchronised in any way, so they can drift relative to
>> one another through the lifetime of the system. This is problematic for
>> a clocksource which ought to be global.
>>
>> Avoid problems by always accessing cluster 0's counter, using
>> cross-cluster register access. This adds overhead so we only do so on
>> systems where we actually have CPUs present in multiple clusters.
>> For now, be extra conservative and don't use gic counter for vdso or
>> sched_clock in this case.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Paul Burton <paulburton@...nel.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Chao-ying Fu <cfu@...ecomp.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Dragan Mladjenovic <dragan.mladjenovic@...mia.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Aleksandar Rikalo <aleksandar.rikalo@...mia.com>
>> ---
>
> Applied patch 7 and 8
I think it won't compile without patch 1 being applid.
Thomas, do you mind to apply patch 1 for now? Given that it's just some extra
function definitions.
Thanks
- Jiaxun
>
> Thanks
>
> --
> <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
>
> Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
> <http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
> <http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
--
- Jiaxun
Powered by blists - more mailing lists